The Effectiveness of Coerced Treatment
6
davpc: d:\data\msdata\msword\art\coerc_da.doc
Table 1: Overview of Coerced Treatment Articles
Assessed
Authors Year Modality(s) Comparison Motivation Findings
Anglin et al. 1989 Methadone High, moderate, and No Main effect for treatment across
low legal coercion all three coercion groups, with
regard to drug use and criminality
during and after treatment.
Brecht & Anglin 1993 Methadone No CJ pressure vs. No All groups showed improvement.
moderate CJ pressure vs. Retention and drug use outcomes
strong CJ pressure were similar regardless of coercion
level.
Collins & Allison 1983 OP and Residential No CJ pressure vs. No Retention rates were lowest among
TASC vs. other CJ voluntary clients, slightly higher
referral among CJ referrals, and highest
among TASC referrals--presumably
due to the closer supervision of the
latter.
Harford et al. 1976 Residential-- Probation, parole, or No Depending on the program,
adolescent, residential pre-trial vs. voluntary retention rates were the same or
young adult, OP-- worse for CJ-referrals.
adolescent, OP young
adult, Methadone
Howard & McCaughrin 1996 Non-methadone Programs 75% + No CJ-dominated programs reported
court-mandated lower compliance. Providing CJ
clients vs. those w/ clients w/ information and choices
25% or fewer was associated w/ better outcomes.
McLellan & Druley 1977 90-day VA Court-referred vs. No Overall, no sig. differences. Trends
Residential voluntary indicate that court-referrals are
more withdrawn early in treatment
but become as engaged as
voluntary admissions during latter
stages of treatment.
Rosenberg & Liftik 1976 Outpatient-- Probation referrals vs. No Probation referrals had higher
alcohol voluntary patients attendance rates than voluntary
admissions. However, only 16%
of probationers continued in
treatment beyond probation period.
Salmon & Salmon 1983 Outpatient Drug-Free TASC referrals No Mixed. Coercion associated with
and Methadone vs. voluntary better outcomes for subgroups (e.g.
older, chronic opiate users), but not
others. Effective for OP, but
not MM.
Schnoll et al. 1980 Residential Legal status vs. no No Clients entering treatment directly
legal status at admission from prison had higher completion
rates than those with no legal
status.
Siddall & Conway 1988 Residential Voluntary vs. No Involuntary admission associated
involuntary with successful discharge.
(Undefined)
Simpson & Friend 1988 Methadone, TC, Legal status vs. no No Retention and drug use outcomes
OP, and Detox legal status at admission were similar for legal status and
non-legal status clients.
Of the five studies which found a positive relationship between legal coercion and
substance misuse treatment, two involved Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC
referrals). TASC attempts to identify drug abusers who come into contact with the criminal
justice system, refer eligible offenders to appropriate treatment, monitor clients' progress while in